Skip to content
HN On Hacker News ↗

Whole cross-sectional human ultrasound tomography

▲ 112 points 25 comments by lnyan 3w ago HN discussion ↗

Pangram verdict · v3.3

We believe that this document is fully human-written

0 %

AI likelihood · overall

Human
100% human-written 0% AI-generated
SEGMENTS · HUMAN 7 of 7
SEGMENTS · AI 0 of 7
WORD COUNT 1,227
PEAK AI % 1% · §7
Analyzed
Jun 20
backend: pangram/v3.3
Segments scanned
7 windows
avg 175 words each
Distribution
100 / 0%
human / AI fraction
Verdict
Human
Pangram v3.3

Article text · 1,227 words · 7 segments analyzed

Human AI-generated
§1 Human · 0%

Holmes, J. H. & Howry, D. H. Ultrasonic diagnosis of abdominal disease. Am. J. Dig. Dis.8, 12–32 (1963).Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Howry, D. H. & Bliss, W. R. Ultrasonic visualization of soft tissue structures of the body. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 40, 579–592 (1952).CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Goldberg, B. B., Gramiak, R. & Freimanis, A. K. Early history of diagnostic ultrasound: the role of American radiologists. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 160, 189–194 (1993).Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Holm, H. H. & Mortensen, T. Ultrasonic scanning in diagnosis of abdominal disease. Acta Chir. Scand. 134, 333–341 (1968).CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Howry, D. H., Holmes, J. H., Cushman, C. R. & Posakony, G. J. Ultrasonic visualization of living organs and tissues; with observations on some disease processes. Geriatrics 10, 123–128 (1955).CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Holm, H. H. Ultrasonic scanning in the diagnosis of space-occupying lesions of the upper abdomen. Br. J. Radiol. 44, 24–36 (1971).Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Donald, I., Macvicar, J. & Brown, T. G. Investigation of abdominal masses by pulsed ultrasound.

§2 Human · 0%

Lancet 1, 1188–1195 (1958).Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Pinto, J., Azevedo, R., Pereira, E. & Caldeira, A. Ultrasonography in gastroenterology: the need for training. GE Port. J. Gastroenterol. 25, 308–316 (2018).Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  Noorkoiv, M., Nosaka, K. & Blazevich, A. J. Assessment of quadriceps muscle cross-sectional area by ultrasound extended-field-of-view imaging. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 109, 631–639 (2010).Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Weng, L. et al. US extended-field-of-view imaging technology. Radiology 203, 877–880 (1997).Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Sauerbrei, E. E. Extended field-of-view sonography: utility in clinical practice. J. Ultrasound Med. 18, 335–341 (1999).Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Kim, S. H., Choi, B. I., Kim, K. W., Lee, K. H. & Han, J. K. Extended field-of-view sonography. J. Ultrasound Med. 22, 385–394 (2003).Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  Wiskin, J., Borup, D. T., Johnson, S. A. & Berggren, M. Non-linear inverse scattering: high resolution quantitative breast tissue tomography. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

§3 Human · 0%

131, 3802–3813 (2012).Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  Huang, L. et al. Breast ultrasound tomography with two parallel transducer arrays. In Medical Imaging 2016: Physics of Medical Imaging (Kontos, D. et al.) 98–109 (SPIE, 2016).Zhang, Y. & Wang, L. Video-rate ring-array ultrasound and photoacoustic tomography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39, 4369–4375 (2020).Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  Duric, N. et al. Clinical breast imaging with ultrasound tomography: a description of the SoftVue system. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 135, 2155 (2014).Article  Google Scholar  Wiskin, J. et al. Full wave 3D inverse scattering transmission ultrasound tomography: breast and whole body imaging. In 2019 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) 951–958 (IEEE, 2019).Wiskin, J. et al. Whole-body imaging using low frequency transmission ultrasound. Acad. Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.01.018 (2023).Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  Park, E.-Y. et al. Fast volumetric ultrasound facilitates high-resolution 3D mapping of tissue compartments. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg8176 (2023).Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  Kirillov, A. et al. Segment anything. In Proc. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 4015–4026 (IEEE, 2023).Szabo, T. L. Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging: Inside Out (Academic Press, 2004).Tissue Properties Database V4.2.

§4 Human · 0%

IT’IS Foundation https://doi.org/10.13099/VIP21000-04-2 (2024).Ballestri, S., Romagnoli, D., Nascimbeni, F., Francica, G. & Lonardo, A. Role of ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and its complications. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 9, 603–627 (2015).Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Lee, M.-J., Wu, Y. & Fried, S. K. Adipose tissue heterogeneity: implication of depot differences in adipose tissue for obesity complications. Mol. Aspects Med. 34, 1–11 (2013).Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Kuczmarski, R. J., Fanelli, M. T. & Koch, G. G. Ultrasonic assessment of body composition in obese adults: overcoming the limitations of the skinfold caliper. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 45, 717–724 (1987).Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Liu, K. H. et al. Sonographic measurement of mesenteric fat thickness is a good correlate with cardiovascular risk factors: comparison with subcutaneous and preperitoneal fat thickness, magnetic resonance imaging and anthropometric indexes. Int.J.Obes. 27, 10 (2003).Article  Google Scholar  Anvery, N. et al. Utility of high-resolution ultrasound in measuring subcutaneous fat thickness. Lasers Surg. Med. 54, 1189–1197 (2022).Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  Hoffmann, J. et al. Measurement of subcutaneous fat tissue: reliability and comparison of caliper and ultrasound via systematic body mapping.

§5 Human · 0%

Sci. Rep. 12, 1 (2022).Article  Google Scholar  Harley, O. J. H. & Pickford, M. A. CT analysis of fat distribution superficial and deep to the Scarpa’s fascial layer in the mid and lower abdomen. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 66, 525–530 (2013).Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Abu-Hijleh, M. F., Roshier, A. L., Al-Shboul, Q., Dharap, A. S. & Harris, P. F. The membranous layer of superficial fascia: evidence for its widespread distribution in the body. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 28, 606–619 (2006).Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Lancerotto, L. et al. Layers of the abdominal wall: anatomical investigation of subcutaneous tissue and superficial fascia. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 33, 835–842 (2011).Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  Graf, R. et al. Ultrasound-assisted liposuction: an analysis of 348 cases. Aesthetic Plast.Surg. 27, 146–153 (2003).Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  Sainani, N. I. et al. The challenging image-guided abdominal mass biopsy: established and emerging techniques ‘if you can see it, you can biopsy it’. Abdom. Imaging 38, 672–696 (2013).Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  Culp, W. C. et al. Relative ultrasonographic echogenicity of standard, dimpled, and polymeric-coated needles. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol.

§6 Human · 1%

11, 351–358 (2000).Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Li, W., Wang, Y., Nteziyaremye, V., Yamaguchi, H. & Shih, A. J. Measurement of the friction force inside the needle in biopsy. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 138, 031003 (2015).Article  Google Scholar  Fulton, N., Buethe, J., Gollamudi, J. & Robbin, M. Simulation-based training may improve resident skill in ultrasound-guided biopsy. Am. J. Roentgenol. 207, 1329–1333 (2016).Article  Google Scholar  Guberina, N. et al. Radiation exposure during CT-guided biopsies: recent CT machines provide markedly lower doses. Eur. Radiol. 28, 3929–3935 (2018).Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  Allocca, M., Kucharzik, T. & Rubin, D. T. Intestinal ultrasound in the assessment and management of inflammatory bowel disease: is it ready for standard practice? Gastroenterology 164, 851–855 (2023).Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  Barat, M. et al. CT and MRI of abdominal cancers: current trends and perspectives in the era of radiomics and artificial intelligence. Jpn. J. Radiol. 42, 246–260 (2024).Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  Rubino F. et al. Definition and diagnostic criteria of clinical obesity. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00316-4 (2025).Siepel, F. J. et al. Needle and biopsy robots: a review.

§7 Human · 1%

Curr. Robot. Rep. 2, 73–84 (2021).Article  Google Scholar  Pfister, R. C., Papanicolaou, N. & Yoder, I. C. Urinary extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: equipment, techniques, and overview. Urol. Radiol. 10, 39–45 (1988).Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Paverd, C., Martin, A., Rominger, M. & Ruby, L. Assessment of ultrasound image quality in a reference phantom using gel and liquid standoff pads. WFUMB Ultrasound Open 2, 100051 (2024).Article  Google Scholar  Wang, C. et al. Bioadhesive ultrasound for long-term continuous imaging of diverse organs. Science 377, 517–523 (2022).Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Shepherd, J. A., Ng, B. K., Sommer, M. J. & Heymsfield, S. B. Body composition by DXA. Bone 104, 101–105 (2017).Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  Cueto, C. et al. Stride: a flexible software platform for high-performance ultrasound computed tomography. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 221, 106855 (2022).Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  Li, L. et al. Single-impulse panoramic photoacoustic computed tomography of small-animal whole-body dynamics at high spatiotemporal resolution. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 1, 0071 (2017).Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  Lin, L. et al. Single-breath-hold photoacoustic computed tomography of the breast.