What the Hell Was Going On With Cigarette Ads in the 70s?

While I was searching for newspaper clippings for my previous post on The Limits to Growth, I came across a sea of cigarette ads from the 1970s. This opened the door to dozens of hours wasted of research through tens of thousand of pages of TIME magazine from early 1969 to late 1974. At times, the TIME magazine1 was basically a cigarettes brochure, with nearly 10% of the content dedicated to such ads -and the other 90% to car, insurance, diamonds and alcohol ads. I’ve gathered more than 900 cigarette adverts and I think I’ve developed a phantom-smoke-stench sensation.Note: The image carousel might show the ads a bit narrow on mobile devices. You can see the whole image if you tap and hold on it.The Creepy OnesWhat’s scarier than cancer? This clown in particular.Benson & Hedges Time 1972-08-14 page 11 and 12I would rather be stuck in the woods with a bear. 🐻Salem Time 1974-03-25 p39Somehow this became 1000 times worse.Salem Time 1974-05-13 p101I knew this creep was a serial killer! RUN FOR YOUR LIFE LADY!!1Salem Time 1974-09-23 p103This guy screams “I’ve got a chopped-up dead body in my refrigerator”Lark Time 1969-02-14 p53The “Defeating the Patriarchy” OnesIs this an ad or an accusation?Winston Time 1974-12-02 p24Also what the heck does that subtitle word-salad mean? That’s spelled S-A-L-A-D.The Animal Abuse OnesDoes this ad imply that an elephant is addicted to nicotine?

You be the judge!Advertisement of VICEROY cigarettes, published in TIME magazine 1969-01-03 p77The Christmas OnesThe Couple OnesFan fact: This is how many wildfires started during the 70s!Raleigh Time 1972-09-25 p64For a moment I thought the lady was cradling a baby. But who would ever smoke so close to a baby?Belair Time 1973-06-18_0045Alive with pleasure…for the time being.Newport Time 1973-10-15 p28Ever been in the house of a couple who smoke? Mmm, breathe it in 👃L&M Liggett & Myers Time 1971-02-15_0001The Mysterious-Macho-Lonely Man OnesThe I-Am-A-Special-Snowflake SubcategoryThe Cowboy Obsession SubcategoryOver the span of 5 years Marlboro published 76 different advertisements covering 92 pages, all featuring one or more cowboys. But why was Marlboro so fixated with cowboys? Did they have a trademark on them, or something? I couldn’t find a single ad from another cigarette brand using a cowboy model, all the while Marlboro used only cowboys and to a much lesser extent just horses.The Racer SubcategoryViceroy was on the hunt for their Cowboy-moment but it didn’t really catch on.What’s Up With the Horses?Obviously in the horses category we have a huge overlap with the Cowboy Obsession one. Out of the 77 pages featuring horses, the 74 are from Marlboro.The Obsessed With the Filter OnesPeople in the 70s were well aware of the dangers of smoking, so cigarette companies continued touting their “healthy filters”, even though they were completely useless. 2‘Might be a pretty good move‘… and they are moving furniture… get it? 🫠Advertisement of LARK cigarettes, published in TIME magazine 1969-01-03 p56Fun fact about the Micronite filter; it contained asbestos fibers3.

You can’t make this shit up!The Low-Tar/Nicotine SubcategoryBecause every brand in the 70s had the lowest tar and nicotine content than 99% of all other cigarettes sold.The Too-Long-Didn’t-Read OnesVantage started releasing this wall of text ads in 1972, presumably trying to persuade smokers that they are not addicted but they choose to smoke because they want to. I picked the following lines as my personal favorites: “Anyone who’s old enough to smoke is old enough to make up his own mind” and “I started smoking because I wanted to. I smoke now because I want to. And I intend to keep on smoking as long as I want to”.If you read through some of them wearing the glasses of hindsight you’ll understand why there’s a special place in hell for these advertisers.The Cartoon OnesJust so you know, Parliament is an American cigarette brand, drawing cartoons of British characters, to praise the “American ingenuity” -truly a full circle of self-congratulation!Parliament Time 1969-02-14 p32Parliament was not the only brand that employed cartoons to sell cigarettes. Benson & Hedges cartoon ads are reminiscent of some of the first Red Bull commercials, while Doral used literal comic strips each ending with the cigarettes having a perverse wish to be tasted.The Waterfall OnesWhat Marlboro had with cowboys, KOOL had with rivers and waterfalls. Because when I think of “serene”, I think of air full of smoke. Take a look below!The Rainbow SubcategoryThe Complete Nonsensical OnesBenson & Hedges cigarette ads were so nonsensical that even the cigarettes featured inside were crooked for some inexplicable reason. We’ve already seen the freaky clown.Look! Cancer!Benson & Hedges Time 1973-03-19_0019What the fuck is happening in this ad? Is the alien going to grope this astronaut?Benson & Hedges Time 1974-01-21_0094All in all, over this 5 year period, 29 different cigarettes brands were advertised. I hadn’t heard of most of them, so I assumed that these brands just failed over time.

Apparently this is not the case, with 22 of these still in circulation. Also just 2 companies, own 15 out of these 29 brands.Philip Morris and its parent company Altria, currently owns Virginia Slims, Parliament, Lark, Benson & Hedges, Marlboro, Multifilter, and L&M (Liggett & Myers).R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company owns Camel, Tareyton, True, Doral, Vantage, Kent, Newport, and Old Gold.Imperial Brands (formerly known as Imperial Tobacco Company) owns Winston, KOOL, Salem and Carlton4.British American Tobacco owns Pall Mall and ViceroyMaryland is owned by Landewyck Tobacco.I could find very little information about Iceberg, but it seems like the brand was owned by American Tobacco Company. The same applies to King Sano, and Lucky Ten.Silva, Belair and Raleigh were owned by Brown & Williamson Tobacco but they are no longer in circulation.Adam was owned by Liggett and Myers Tobacco Company and little is known about its fate.All of them in chronological orderBonusDad smoking a cigar straight into his newborn’s face -ah, these were truly simpler times!Equitable of Iowa Time 1969-05-23 p122See what I did there?↩No cigarette filter reduces the risk of cancer, emphysema, or heart disease. This is because the smoker inhales more deeply to get the smoke through the filter and thus is exposed to greater concentrations of toxic gases and other chemicals.↩from 1952 to 1956↩It appears this is no longer active, since it doesn’t appear in the company’s brand portfolio↩Post navigation