Skip to content
HN On Hacker News ↗

'Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but ..'

▲ 78 points 88 comments by turrini 2mo ago HN discussion ↗

Pangram verdict · v3.3

We believe that this document is fully human-written

0 %

AI likelihood · overall

Human
100% human-written 0% AI-generated
SEGMENTS · HUMAN 1 of 1
SEGMENTS · AI 0 of 1
WORD COUNT 205
PEAK AI % 0% · §1
Analyzed
Jul 12
backend: pangram/v3.3
Segments scanned
1 windows
avg 205 words each
Distribution
100 / 0%
human / AI fraction
Verdict
Human
Pangram v3.3

Article text · 205 words · 1 segments analyzed

Human AI-generated
§1 Human · 0%

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]

List: openbsd-misc Subject: Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .. From: Theo de Raadt <deraadt () cvs ! openbsd ! org> Date: 2007-10-24 1:14:13 Message-ID: 200710240114.l9O1EDt3003562 () cvs ! openbsd ! org [Download RAW message or body]

> Virtualization seems to have a lot of security benefits.

You've been smoking something really mind altering, and I think you should share it.

x86 virtualization is about basically placing another nearly full kernel, full of new bugs, on top of a nasty x86 architecture which barely has correct page protection. Then running your operating system on the other side of this brand new pile of shit.

You are absolutely deluded, if not stupid, if you think that a worldwide collection of software engineers who can't write operating systems or applications without security holes, can then turn around and suddenly write virtualization layers without security holes.

You've seen something on the shelf, and it has all sorts of pretty colours, and you've bought it.

That's all x86 virtualization is.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]

Configure |

About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic