Skip to content
HN On Hacker News ↗

Jev Pong

▲ 10 points • 4 comments • by matt_oriordan • 3w ago • HN discussion ↗

Pangram verdict · v3.3

We believe that this entire text is AI.

70 %

AI likelihood · overall

AI
0% human-written 100% AI-generated
SEGMENTS · HUMAN 0 of 1
SEGMENTS · AI 0 of 1
WORD COUNT 145
PEAK AI % 70% · §1
Analyzed
Sep 18
backend: pangram/v3.3
Segments scanned
1 windows
avg 145 words each
Distribution
0 / 100%
human / AI fraction
Verdict
AI
Pangram v3.3

Article text · 145 words · 1 segments analyzed

Human AI-generated
§1 Mixed · 70%

Jev PongAbly LabsPlayPlay against JevHow it worksSourceJev returns a decision in 227ms. The chat models take 2.5 to 3.5 seconds.Here's what that does to a game of Pong.Recorded run · Vercel (iad1) via Vercel AI Gatewayreplay0.0 sJevTypeSafe AI—ms0 decisions · 0 returnsGemini 3.8 FlashGoogle—ms0 decisions · 0 returnsClaude Haiku 4.5Anthropic—ms0 decisions · 0 returnsGPT-5.6 SolOpenAI—ms0 decisions · 0 returnsmodeldecisions/savg msp95 msin first 12 sJevTypeSafe AI4.4022740047Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle0.32316774383Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic0.40248383582GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI0.283529103502Four lanes, one game: same serve, same rules, same question, asked of a different model in each. One answer moves the ball one step, so every ball travels at its own model's answer time and nothing is skipped or sped up. Jev is a typed-decision model rather than a chat model, and Pong is the Atari game chat models handle worst, so a loop that won't wait is the fair place to see what that's worth.