Skip to content
HN On Hacker News ↗

New Lower and Upper Bounds for the Grothendieck Constant

▲ 50 points 11 comments by surprisetalk 1w ago HN discussion ↗

Pangram verdict · v3.3

We believe that this entire text is human-written.

0 %

AI likelihood · overall

Human
100% human-written 0% AI-generated
SEGMENTS · HUMAN 1 of 1
SEGMENTS · AI 0 of 1
WORD COUNT 154
PEAK AI % 0% · §1
Analyzed
Aug 14
backend: pangram/v3.3
Segments scanned
1 windows
avg 154 words each
Distribution
100 / 0%
human / AI fraction
Verdict
Human
Pangram v3.3

Article text · 154 words · 1 segments analyzed

Human AI-generated
§1 Human · 0%

View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:We establish new bounds on the Grothendieck constant $K_G$: \[ \frac{6\pi}{11} \le K_G \le \frac{\pi}{2\log(1+\sqrt2)} - 10^{-4}. \] Methodologically, our lower bound approach differs from previous works by establishing limitations on the asymptotically optimal Krivine schemes, rather than giving explicit constructions of gap instances. Our upper bound is obtained by proposing and analyzing the first asymptotic construction of rounding schemes, whereas previous works only consider low-dimensional schemes. Together, these bounds determine the previously unknown tenths digit of $K_G$ to be $7$. The bounds were discovered by a long-running collaborative effort of humans and a long-horizon AI research system that we engineered. Subjects: Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS) Cite as: arXiv:2608.11158 [cs.CC] (or arXiv:2608.11158v2 [cs.CC] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.11158 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Rahul Saha [view email] [v1] Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:16:09 UTC (966 KB) [v2] Wed, 12 Aug 2026 02:15:47 UTC (966 KB)