Skip to content
HN On Hacker News ↗

If LLMs Have Human-Like Attributes, Then So Does Age of Empires II

▲ 116 points 116 comments by ketchup32613 1d ago HN discussion ↗

Pangram verdict · v3.3

We believe that this document is fully human-written

1 %

AI likelihood · overall

Human
100% human-written 0% AI-generated
SEGMENTS · HUMAN 3 of 3
SEGMENTS · AI 0 of 3
WORD COUNT 461
PEAK AI % 1% · §2
Analyzed
Jun 7
backend: pangram/v3.3
Segments scanned
3 windows
avg 154 words each
Distribution
100 / 0%
human / AI fraction
Verdict
Human
Pangram v3.3

Article text · 461 words · 3 segments analyzed

Human AI-generated
§1 Human · 1%

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2605.31514 (cs)

[Submitted on 29 May 2026 (v1), last revised 1 Jun 2026 (this version, v2)] View PDF Abstract:Much research has been carried out on large language models (LLMs) and LLM-powered agentic workflows. However, many works within the field state emergence of, ascribe to, or assume, generalised anthropomorphic attributes to them (e.g., morality or understanding of natural language). Our goal is not to argue in favour or against the existence of these attributes, but to point out that these conclusions could be incorrect. For this we build and train a simple neural network on the videogame Age of Empires II, and note that any entity in a sufficiently-powerful substrate, such as LEGO or the Greater Boston Area, could also present such attributes. Hence, the purported anthropomorphic attributes of LLMs are empirically non-unique: although some properties (e.g., responses to prompts) could remain constant, others, such as the interpretation of their perceived behaviour, might change with the substrate. Thus, any empirically-grounded discussion requires explicit measurement criteria; otherwise the interpretation is left to the representation. We then show that assuming that these attributes exist or not in a system, independent of the substrate and in a generalised way, leads to either circular or uninformative conclusions, regardless of the experimenter's viewpoint on the subject. Finally we propose a 'null' assumption, where one assumes LLM non-uniqueness instead of assuming anthropomorphic attributes to set up an experiment, along with examples of it. We also discuss potential objections to our work, briefly survey the field, and prove that Age of Empires II is functionally- and Turing-complete.

Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY) Cite as: arXiv:2605.31514 [cs.CL]   (or arXiv:2605.31514v2 [cs.

§2 Human · 1%

CL] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.31514 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Adrian de Wynter [view email] [v1] Fri, 29 May 2026 16:31:31 UTC (13,704 KB) [v2] Mon, 1 Jun 2026 21:31:22 UTC (13,705 KB)

Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Connected Papers Toggle Litmaps Toggle scite.ai Toggle

Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle

Links to Code Toggle

DagsHub Toggle GotitPub

§3 Human · 0%

Toggle

Huggingface Toggle

ScienceCast Toggle

Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Spaces Toggle Spaces Toggle Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Core recommender toggle

About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.