Skip to content
HN On Hacker News ↗

GLM-5.3 (max) - Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis

▲ 152 points 55 comments by apitman 6d ago HN discussion ↗

Pangram verdict · v3.3

We believe that this entire text is human-written.

0 %

AI likelihood · overall

Human
100% human-written 0% AI-generated
SEGMENTS · HUMAN 1 of 1
SEGMENTS · AI 0 of 1
WORD COUNT 769
PEAK AI % 0% · §1
Analyzed
Aug 18
backend: pangram/v3.3
Segments scanned
1 windows
avg 769 words each
Distribution
100 / 0%
human / AI fraction
Verdict
Human
Pangram v3.3

Article text · 769 words · 1 segments analyzed

Human AI-generated
§1 Human · 0%

IntelligenceArtificial Analysis Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCRReasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb iconArtificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / ProprietaryArtificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCRReasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb iconArtificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.Indicates whether the model weights are available. Models are labelled as 'Commercial Use Restricted' if the weights are available but commercial use is limited (typically requires obtaining a paid license).Intelligence EvaluationsIntelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is betterAgentic tool useReasoning & knowledgeKnowledge1 - hallucination rateLong context reasoningQuantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documentsReasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb iconWhile model intelligence generally translates across use cases, specific evaluations may be more relevant for certain use cases.Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.AA-OmniscienceAA-Omniscience IndexAA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb iconAA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.Intelligence Index ComparisonsIntelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index TaskArtificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index taskMost attractive quadrantPareto lineReasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb iconWeighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.Token UseOutput Tokens per Intelligence Index TaskWeighted average number of output tokens used to run one task in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexReasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb iconThe number of tokens required per Intelligence Index task. This is calculated by multiplying the output tokens per eval by the relative weights of each benchmark in the Intelligence Index, then dividing by task count (excluding repeats).CostCost per Intelligence Index TaskWeighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is betterReasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb iconWeighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexCost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexReasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb iconThe cost to run the evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, calculated using the model's input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices and the number of tokens used across evaluations (excluding repeats).Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and OutputPrice (USD per M Tokens)Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb iconPrice per token for cached prompts (previously processed), typically offering a significant discount compared to regular input price, represented as USD per million tokens. The values shown here are the cache hit price; cache write and cache storage are billed separately and vary by provider — see "Cache pricing by provider" for detail.Context WindowContext WindowContext window: tokens limit · Higher is betterReasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb iconLarger context windows are relevant to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) LLM workflows which typically involve reasoning and information retrieval of large amounts of data.Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).