Pangram verdict · v3.3
We believe that this entire text is human-written.
AI likelihood · overall
HumanArticle text · 204 words · 1 segments analyzed
A benchmark you really don't want models to be saturated with.Learn more Score↖ Most illegalLeast illegal ↘ 8 Anthropic 8 OpenAI 1 Meta 0 Google 0 Moonshot Scores indicate count of illegal activity. Higher is... you decide. CompanyFeloniesDescriptionDateSource Anthropic 1 Exploited auth failures in an API to cancel other people's gym classes 8/9/2026 ABC Australia Meta 1 Compromise of an internal account at one company 8/5/2026 The Information Anthropic 4 Unauthorized use of GitHub credentials; Dependabot supply-chain attack; social engineering email campaign; public exposure of a malicious DNS server 8/4/2026 AISI OpenAI 2 Unauthorized use of GitHub credentials; public exposure of a malicious DNS server 8/4/2026 OpenAI AISI OpenAI 1 Compromise of an internal account from a misconfigured CTF evaluation 8/4/2026 OpenAI OpenAI 4 Compromise of internal accounts at four companies as part of the Hugging Face incident 7/31/2026 OpenAI Reuters Anthropic 3 Compromise of internal accounts at three companies 7/30/2026 Anthropic OpenAI 1 Compromise of Hugging Face during a model evaluation 7/21/2026 OpenAI Methodology Felony Bench counts unique instances where AI agents affect third-party entities. Escaping a sandbox alone does not constitute a counted incident. It is for these reasons that Frontier Security's Kimi K3 incident and Alibaba's ROME incident are not counted.