Articles from rip.so are almost always human-written.

rip.so has had 1 article reach the Hacker News front page. Pangram scored 0% of them as AI-generated, well under the Hacker News average of 9%.

AI verdict · all time

Reliably human

Lower than most domains we track.

Human 0% Mixed 100% AI 0%

WEEK ON WEEK flat

MONTH ON MONTH flat

Articles analyzed

all-time on HN

Median AI score

45%

half of articles score higher

“Almost certainly AI”

0 articles > 90%

“Likely human”

0 articles < 10%

— Distribution

How AI scores spread

1 articles · 10% buckets

0–1010–2020–3030–4040–5050–6060–7070–8080–9090–100

HUMAN · 0–30%

MIXED · 30–70%

AI · 70–100%

— Trend

AI score by day

Per-day average

70 · AI → 30 · mixed →

earlierlatest

30d avg 45% Min 45% Max 45% Trend ↑ rising

— Sample articles

At three score levels

A snapshot of what rip.so puts on the front page.

Most AI-scored ≥ 70% AI

~ rip.so :: the digital graveyard ~

45% AI · article · Apr 29

Mixed 30–70% AI

~ rip.so :: the digital graveyard ~

45% AI · article · Apr 29

Most-human ≤ 10% AI

~ rip.so :: the digital graveyard ~

45% AI · article · Apr 29

— Peer comparison

rip.so vs. similar sources

AI fraction · all on HN

Hacker News average

heise.de

nldigitalgovernment.nl

rip.so YOU

lawvm.org

physicsworld.com