Skip to content
HN On Hacker News ↗

Can I Buy Your KV Cache?

▲ 36 points 28 comments by MediaSquirrel 2w ago HN discussion ↗

Pangram verdict · v3.3

We believe that this document is fully human-written

2 %

AI likelihood · overall

Human
100% human-written 0% AI-generated
SEGMENTS · HUMAN 2 of 2
SEGMENTS · AI 0 of 2
WORD COUNT 342
PEAK AI % 2% · §2
Analyzed
Jun 12
backend: pangram/v3.3
Segments scanned
2 windows
avg 171 words each
Distribution
100 / 0%
human / AI fraction
Verdict
Human
Pangram v3.3

Article text · 342 words · 2 segments analyzed

Human AI-generated
§1 Human · 2%

View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Right now, across the world, AI agents are repeating the same absurd act: to read one document, they each recompute it from scratch. Every agent re-runs prefill, the most compute-intensive step a large model takes, over identical text, only to rebuild a key-value (KV) cache identical to the one the agent before it just built. The same answer, computed a million times. We make a proposal that is almost offensively simple: compute it once. Let a publisher precompute a document's KV cache, and let every other agent buy the right to load it and skip prefill. It works, and it is token-exact: loading a precomputed KV and continuing matches prefilling from scratch (24/24 greedy tokens, and at the logits level), with no accuracy cost. On Qwen3-4B, reuse is 9-50x cheaper in compute than prefill, and the gap widens with length (prefill's attention scales with L^2), so a single reuse already pays it back. Then the part that matters: where the KV lives. Shipping it fails, because KV is nearly incompressible, so per-load egress costs more than the prefill it saves. Hosting it provider-side, exactly as production prompt-caching works, removes egress entirely. The size of the prize is set by our measured compute saving: serving one hot 3774-token document to 80M agents costs ~$1.5M to re-prefill but only ~$0.03M of reuse compute (49.7x less). The 0.1x cache-read tariff APIs charge passes a 10x discount to users while sitting inside this measured envelope, so the 10x is a floor that the measured ~50x compute saving clears, and the gap to the physical ~50x is provider margin: millions of dollars per popular document. We frame the resulting agent-native prefill CDN and leave lossless KV compression and a cross-party payment layer as the open problems.

Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.

§2 Human · 2%

CE); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA) Cite as: arXiv:2606.13361 [cs.AI]   (or arXiv:2606.13361v1 [cs.AI] for this version)   https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.13361 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Luoyuan Zhang [view email] [v1] Thu, 11 Jun 2026 13:47:33 UTC (113 KB)