Skip to content
HN On Hacker News ↗

Ask HN: Why Opus4.6 was silently removed from Claude Code?

▲ 15 points 22 comments by t0duf0du 4w ago HN discussion ↗

Pangram verdict · v3.3

We believe that this document is fully human-written

0 %

AI likelihood · overall

Human
100% human-written 0% AI-generated
SEGMENTS · HUMAN 1 of 1
SEGMENTS · AI 0 of 1
WORD COUNT 94
PEAK AI % 0% · §1
Analyzed
Apr 22
backend: pangram/v3.3
Segments scanned
1 windows
avg 94 words each
Distribution
100 / 0%
human / AI fraction
Verdict
Human
Pangram v3.3

Article text · 94 words · 1 segments analyzed

Human AI-generated
§1 Human · 0%

srvmshr 1 minute ago | [–] Generally it is a good practice to keep v.[N] and [N-1] in active deployment. But lately a lot of policies from Anthropic are confusing at best, and at worst plain subscriber-hostile.If costs are drowning them, they should rather be a bit more honest about the messaging and hike prices of their lower ($20 / $100) tier by ~$10 and enforce stricter limits (optionally).I liked 4.5 and 4.6, but none of them are available outside of using API now - and thats a bummer given the 2~2.5X usage costsreply