Skip to content
HN On Hacker News ↗

Ask HN: Is "no source code was copied" still a sufficient copyright defense?

▲ 68 points 82 comments by oscgam1 2w ago HN discussion ↗

Pangram verdict · v3.3

We believe that this document is fully human-written

0 %

AI likelihood · overall

Human
100% human-written 0% AI-generated
SEGMENTS · HUMAN 1 of 1
SEGMENTS · AI 0 of 1
WORD COUNT 84
PEAK AI % 0% · §1
Analyzed
Jun 26
backend: pangram/v3.3
Segments scanned
1 windows
avg 84 words each
Distribution
100 / 0%
human / AI fraction
Verdict
Human
Pangram v3.3

Article text · 84 words · 1 segments analyzed

Human AI-generated
§1 Human · 0%

We are all familiar with the Corgi event: https://x.com/mfts0/status/2070080422482977095With the barrier to create new apps having dropped significantly thanks to LLMs, I am seeing more cases about copyright and unfair competition.I've seen and participated in some of these cases. Usually expert witnesses are required.Curious to hear the community stance on this one."Now software developers are feeling what authors and artist felt". https://x.com/PriyRanjan96/status/2070204156703568377There are several claims of: Copying UI is Ok, your product is not undifferentiated enough.Here is a legal assessment of the situation: https://x.com/jessebradner/status/2070492879718350986