Skip to content
HN On Hacker News ↗

Anthropic’s Project Glasswing Update

▲ 38 points 4 comments by mikece 12h ago HN discussion ↗

Pangram verdict · v3.3

We believe that this document is fully human-written

0 %

AI likelihood · overall

Human
100% human-written 0% AI-generated
SEGMENTS · HUMAN 1 of 1
SEGMENTS · AI 0 of 1
WORD COUNT 145
PEAK AI % 0% · §1
Analyzed
Jun 8
backend: pangram/v3.3
Segments scanned
1 windows
avg 145 words each
Distribution
100 / 0%
human / AI fraction
Verdict
Human
Pangram v3.3

Article text · 145 words · 1 segments analyzed

Human AI-generated
§1 Human · 0%

In April, Anthropic initated Project Glasswing. The idea was to let companies use their new model to find and fix vulnerabilities in their own software. It was a fantastic PR move, and so many press outlets have uncritically parroted Anthropic’s claims that it’s now common wisdom that Mythos is better at finding software vulnerabilities than other models. Which is just not true. In any case, Anthropic has published a Project Glasswing status report. It’s finding a lot of vulnerabilities in software—yay! Some of them are even dangerous. But almost none of them has been patched. It’s weird. There’s something fishy about the data that I don’t understand. That Anthropic refuses to release details—that it just says “trust us”—is a big problem here.

Tags: AI, patching, vulnerabilities

Posted on June 8, 2026 at 7:01 AM • 1 Comments

Sidebar photo of Bruce Schneier by Joe MacInnis.