Pangram verdict · v3.3
We believe that this text is a mix of AI and human-written content.
81 %
AI likelihood · overall
AI 19% human-written
81% AI-generated
Analyzed
Oct 31
backend: pangram/v3.3
Segments scanned
3 windows
avg 26 words each
Distribution
19 / 81%
human / AI fraction
Verdict
AI
Pangram v3.3
Article text · 79 words · 3 segments analyzed
Human
AI-generated
§1 Human · 0%
Jiahao Shao@jiahaoshao1Shame on @DarioAmodei / Anthropic.
§2 AI · 100%
I never distilled Claude—rollouts came from a strong open-source model; Claude just helped submit jobs and run analysis. Still got tagged for "training a competitor," and now anything touching RFT, SFT, or training larger models gets me blocked, Opus 5.5 downgraded to Opus 5, or the session killed outright. You built your models on the world's data, then treat paying users doing research automation as the enemy.
§3 Human · 1%
Pathetic.10:22 AM · Oct 31, 2026106.2KViews