Skip to content
HN On Hacker News โ†—

๐Ÿฅ”๐Ÿฅ”๐Ÿฅ” (@argofowl) on X

โ–ฒ 201 points โ€ข 181 comments โ€ข by matthieu_bl โ€ข 1d ago โ€ข HN discussion โ†—

Pangram verdict ยท v3.3

We believe that this entire text is AI.

100 %

AI likelihood ยท overall

AI
0% human-written 100% AI-generated
SEGMENTS ยท HUMAN 0 of 1
SEGMENTS ยท AI 1 of 1
WORD COUNT 113
PEAK AI % 100% ยท ยง1
Analyzed
Aug 22
backend: pangram/v3.3
Segments scanned
1 windows
avg 113 words each
Distribution
0 / 100%
human / AI fraction
Verdict
AI
Pangram v3.3

Article text ยท 113 words ยท 1 segments analyzed

Human AI-generated
ยง1 AI ยท 100%

update: it's server-side, not the app anthropic enrols fable 5 sessions on claude code 2.1.236+ into an experiment that shrinks the effort scale, older versions and opus 5 are left alone probably an a/b test, so not everyone will see it if "high" feels like "low" for you, you're in the test group holy fuck anthropic, you guys are unbearable sometimesif fable felt dumber this week, it's not you โ—โ—โ— since 2.1.237 the model reads "high" effort as 10 out of 100, the exact number "low" used to be and the changelog doesn't say a word i spent my whole afternoon convinced t3 code and my own app were broken before i went