Skip to content
HN On Hacker News ↗

AI companies are parasites

▲ 71 points • 37 comments • by cdrnsf • 4d ago • HN discussion ↗

Pangram verdict · v3.3

We believe that this entire text is human-written.

3 %

AI likelihood · overall

Human
100% human-written 0% AI-generated
SEGMENTS · HUMAN 1 of 1
SEGMENTS · AI 0 of 1
WORD COUNT 230
PEAK AI % 3% · §1
Analyzed
Oct 5
backend: pangram/v3.3
Segments scanned
1 windows
avg 230 words each
Distribution
100 / 0%
human / AI fraction
Verdict
Human
Pangram v3.3

Article text · 230 words · 1 segments analyzed

Human AI-generated
§1 Human · 3%

Merriam-Webster:An organism living in, on, or with another organism in order to obtain nutrients, grow, or multiply often in a state that directly or indirectly harms the host.That's it, right? The whole thing, their entire business model.Scrape the whole of the internet, destroy books, siphon everything they can from whoever they can without compensation, and call it fair use.Train models on said stolen data.Sell metered access to the models.Repeat until you've killed the host.Hope you can head off the effects of AI inbreeding.The old bargain of traffic for indexing is gone. Scrapers overload infrastructure. Clickthroughs collapse. Communities collapse.1Yes, licensing deals exist. Reddit is selling access to its data, but that data is human-generated and depends on a flagging community the company seems, at best, indifferent to.They'll even show up in your community and set up a data center that nobody (well, except for the people profiting from it) wants. Maybe they'll spin up gas generators and send pollution your way. Or they'll drive up your electricity and water rates. But what about jobs? Most of those only exist during construction and, who knows, they might just hire folks from outside your area for that.They never should've attached themselves to society, and it may be too late to dislodge them. At least we get stilted prose, images that look like Pixar rehashes, and code nobody understands.How's Stack Overflow doing lately? ↩